Bug#164768: libc: IPv6 still not correct.
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 09:26:31AM -0500, Colin Watson wrote:
> Is there any compromise we can reach *without* applying hacks that
> cover up the fact that glibc doesn't cope with the differently-sized
> kernel structure?
Half tongue-in-cheek, half not: Is 2.2 a supported kernel for the
sarge release? Since the 2.4 series has stabilized, it might be time
to put thoughts into just telling people that 2.4 is Good And Right.
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
--
learning from failures is nice in theory...
but in practice, it sucks :)
- Wolfgang Jaehrling
Reply to: