On Fri, 2002-10-18 at 12:35, Jeff Bailey wrote: > Do you think making libc6-dbg pre-depend instead of depend'ing on > libc6 (= 2.3.1-1) would work? Should --- though, according to policy, libc6 will only be unpacked. But since it is Essential: yes, it should work that way. What a fun bug. Hope you have sash installed ;-)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part