Re: glibc-snapshot package
On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 03:51:44AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > In short, I doubt we will get sufficient testing on problematic
> > arches unless we take the leap and push into sid. However I would
> > make sure that the findsyms perl script I wrote has been run on the
> > debian sid package archives for any arches which we have to create a
> > libgcc-compat for to make sure our list of libgcc symbols is complete.
> > I'm not sure that is the case for mips yet for example.
> >
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-glibc/2002/debian-glibc-200209/msg00164.html
>
> I want to know mips has this problem (buildd tell us the answer, I hope).
> If so, I agree we should fix as you said.
I'm investigating this. I have a libgcc-comat patch for mips (
http://honk.physik.uni-konstanz.de/linux-mips/glibc/patches/experimental/libgcc-compat-mips.dpatch
) and am currently scanning the unstable distribution. The tests in my
small chroot showed that a libgcc-compat for mips might not be
necessary, but only the complete scan will show.
Regards,
-- Guido
Reply to: