Re: install-info vs. perl 5.8
At Fri, 6 Sep 2002 13:39:14 +0100,
Colin Watson wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 05:04:54AM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 09:54:43AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > Does that mean that there isn't going to be an attempt to get
> > > current glibc 2.2.<smallnum> into testing, by fixing #155904? Are
> > > you just going straight for the pre-2.3 track?
> >
> > Hmm. 155904 isn't a valid bug anymore - Apache's been recompiled to
> > cope with this. I'll close it now.
>
> I'd been told that the plan was to have libc6 depend on libdb1-compat
> for the next release, which was why I asked.
I still confuse that 'libc6 depends libdb1-compat' does not affect
any system breakage. Is apache's recompilation enough for this
issue, or not?
-- gotom
Reply to: