Re: new packaging failure
At Sat, 31 Aug 2002 09:20:35 -0400 (EDT),
Jack Howarth wrote:
> Yes, it looks like it got bumped from libpthread-0.9.so to
> libpthread-0.10.so. The Banner file that is placed in
> ~/debian-glibccvs/glibc-2.3/glibc-2.2.92/linuxthreads now cats..
>
> linuxthreads-0.10 by Xavier Leroy
>
> I'll see if I can figure how to correct for that and finish my
> packaging.
I've fixed it, please repull cvs, and try again.
BTW, I successfully build on glibc-2.2.92.deb on i386 using
binary only install-info. Look at my machines's dpkg -l as follows :-)
Thanks Jeff and Jack for your working.
gotom@celesta:~> env LANG=C dpkg -l libc6\* glibc\* locales nscd
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name Version Description
+++-==============-==============-============================================
ii libc6 2.2.92-1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone
ii libc6-dbg 2.2.92-1 GNU C Library: Libraries with debugging symb
ii libc6-dev 2.2.92-1 GNU C Library: Development Libraries and Hea
ii libc6-pic 2.2.92-1 GNU C Library: PIC archive library
ii libc6-prof 2.2.92-1 GNU C Library: Profiling Libraries.
iF glibc-doc 2.2.92-1 GNU C Library: Documentation
ii locales 2.2.92-1 GNU C Library: National Language (locale) da
ii nscd 2.2.92-1 GNU C Library: Name Service Cache Daemon
Binary version install-info breaks installing glibc-doc, however...
gotom@celesta:~> env LANG=C sudo dpkg -i glibc-doc_2.2.92-1_all.deb
(Reading database ... 195090 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace glibc-doc 2.2.92-1 (using glibc-doc_2.2.92-1_all.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement glibc-doc ...
Setting up glibc-doc (2.2.92-1) ...
install-info: No such file or directory for GNU Libraries:
dpkg: error processing glibc-doc (--install):
subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
glibc-doc
-- gotom
Reply to: