Re: [installer@ftp-master.debian.org: db1-compat_2.1.3-4_i386.changes ACCEPTED]
At Tue, 20 Aug 2002 09:08:44 -0500,
Anthony Towns wrote:
> According the update_excuses, there are also the following RC bugs:
>
> * #153263: libc6-prof: unusable on arm
> * #151804: libc6: libbind security hole
> * #152099: an empty directory string in LD_LIBRARY_PATH is
> interpreted as '.'
> * #155606: provide symbols .hidden in gcc 3.1/3.2 when building
> glibc for ppc
> * #156841: glibc_2.2.5-13(alpha/unstable): FTBFS: non-PIC code in a
> dynamic lib
>
> Presumably 156841 was fixed in -14; I've heard rumours that 153263 isn't
> an issue anymore either. 152099 seems like it's not being treated by
> you guys as "grave", so it should probably be downgraded or closed so
> the testing scripts know what's going on. 151804 has a remark indicating
> it's been fixed, and should be closed. I don't really follow why 155606
> is critical (important, sure, but "breaks unrelated software, the whole
> system, causes serious data loss, or introduces a security hole" ?).
>
> Since -13 bumped the shlibs, this has been blocking every package updated
> in the last two weeks from entering testing, which isn't healthy.
Ouch.
#151804 and #156841 have just be closed because it's fixed.
#152099 is downgraded to normal. Thanks Philip.
#153263 is kept on woody... Yeah, I missed :-)
Jack Howarth <howarth@bromo.med.uc.edu> and Franz Sirl
<Franz.Sirl-kernel@lauterbach.com> is discussing at the upstream. If
thier patches are included on upstream, then we can only pull from the
upstream cvs. But, #155606 can be downgraded to important, as you
said. Thanks Philip to work re-tagging it.
Regards,
-- gotom
Reply to: