Re: debian/patches review
At Wed, 7 Aug 2002 19:44:43 +0200,
Michael Fedrowitz wrote:
> > glibc22-m68k-compat.dpatch
> > 2.2 CVS: not in
> > 2.3 CVS: not in
> > Comment: Should be merged within upstream if it's ok.
> > Status: merge
>
> No, see bug #78937 for details. And I suppose most of it could be
> dropped since 2.0 kernels aren't supported anymore. Only the evil
> compat_symbol hack is still neccassary (might still be old binaries
> around which have been build against glibc-2.1.x) and that part is
> Debian specific.
So, we should keep applying only the below patch as Debian specific?
diff -urN glibc-2.1.95.orig/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/m68k/chown.c glibc-2.1.95/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/m68k/chown.c
--- glibc-2.1.95.orig/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/m68k/chown.c Fri Sep 1 05:58:10 2000
+++ glibc-2.1.95/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/m68k/chown.c Sat Oct 14 14:58:38 2000
@@ -72,3 +72,8 @@
#endif
}
weak_alias (__chown, chown)
+
+#include <shlib-compat.h>
+#if SHLIB_COMPAT (libc, GLIBC_2_1, GLIBC_2_2)
+compat_symbol (libc, __chown, chown, GLIBC_2_1);
+#endif
> > glibc22-m68k-fpic.dpatch
> > 2.2 CVS: not in
> > 2.3 CVS: not in
> > Comment: Should be merged within upstream if it's ok.
> > Status: merge
>
> Yes, this one would make sense, if upstream will accept it (see bug
> #97663 for what it's all about).
Thanks for your comments, I update 0status.
-- gotom
Reply to: