On Sat, Aug 03, 2002 at 10:23:50PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 03, 2002 at 07:01:09PM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> > I'm a little concerned by the number of patches in the glibc packages.
> > What do you think of the idea of requiring from here in that the
> > description contain a note saying either (i) This is a backport from
> > CVS or (ii) why this patch isn't included upstream and what the path
> Sounds good to me. Most of them are from current 2.2 CVS, or from 2.3
BTW, after -13, I'll go through the current patches, mark them, and also
update to current 2.2.5+ CVS.
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://linux1394.sourceforge.net/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
Deqo - http://www.deqo.com/