Re: Insight into building glibc with gcc-3.0
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 02:07:41AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 04:19:21PM -0500, Gordon Sadler wrote:
> > I've conducted some tests building glibc-2.2.3+nis patch with gcc-2.95-4
> > from Debian unstable and some local builds of gcc-3.0. After reading
> > some archives of the glibc mailing lists, I discovered some oddities on
> > the build process.
> (...)
> > So testing released builds of glibc is not very worthwhile for checking
> > the integrity of gcc-3.0 until glibc is updated -(.
>
> Interesting considering I've done many glibc builds with gcc-3.0. In
> fact, every sparc glibc builds uses gcc-3.0 to builds the 64bit libs.
>
> Are you exporting CC=gcc-3.0?
Now that I've looked at this, it appears to be a gcc-3.0 bug, not glibc.
Gcc-3.0 need to search for the correct binary. Currently gcc-3's cpp is
called cpp0. Maybe there needs to be a default symlink in gcc-3's binary
directory to point cpp -> cpp0.
Ben
--
-----------=======-=-======-=========-----------=====------------=-=------
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` bcollins@debian.org -- bcollins@openldap.org -- bcollins@linux.com '
`---=========------=======-------------=-=-----=-===-======-------=--=---'
Reply to: