[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: New glibc 2.1.92 test packages (i386, powerpc, sparc)



> /build/source/glibc-2.1.92/m68k-linux/obj/elf/ld.so.1 --library-path /build/source/glibc-2.1.92/m68k-linux/obj:/build/source/glibc-2.1.92/m68k-linux/obj/math:/build/source/glibc-2.1.92/m68k-linux/obj/elf:/build/source/glibc-2.1.92/m68k-linux/obj/dlfcn:/build/source/glibc-2.1.92/m68k-linux/obj/nss:/build/source/glibc-2.1.92/m68k-linux/obj/nis:/build/source/glibc-2.1.92/m68k-linux/obj/rt:/build/source/glibc-2.1.92/m68k-linux/obj/resolv:/build/source/glibc-2.1.92/m68k-linux/obj/crypt:/build/source/glibc-2.1.92/m68k-linux/obj/db2:/build/source/glibc-2.1.92/m68k-linux/obj/linuxthreads /build/source/glibc-2.1.92/m68k-linux/obj/sunrpc/rpcgen -Y `gcc -print-file-name=cpp | sed "s|/cpp$||"` -c rpcsvc/bootparam_prot.x -o /build/source/glibc-2.1.92/m68k-linux/obj/sunrpc/xbootparam_prot.T
> make[3]: *** [/build/source/glibc-2.1.92/m68k-linux/obj/sunrpc/xbootparam_prot.stmp] Segmentation fault
> make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/source/glibc-2.1.92/glibc-2.1.92/sunrpc'
> make[2]: *** [sunrpc/others] Error 2
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/source/glibc-2.1.92/glibc-2.1.92'
> make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/source/glibc-2.1.92/m68k-linux/obj'

Try executing this directly:

	/build/source/glibc-2.1.92/m68k-linux/obj/elf/ld.so.1

Does that by itself get a segmentation fault? Also, are you building as
root, or under fakeroot? If under fakeroot, then don't, it has issues
building glibc. If the above works ok, and you are building as root, try:

	/build/source/glibc-2.1.92/m68k-linux/obj/elf/ld.so.1 \
		/build/source/glibc-2.1.92/m68k-linux/obj/libc.so

That should produce some nice information on the library.

-- 
 -----------=======-=-======-=========-----------=====------------=-=------
/  Ben Collins  --  ...on that fantastic voyage...  --  Debian GNU/Linux   \
`  bcollins@debian.org  --  bcollins@openldap.org  --  bcollins@linux.com  '
 `---=========------=======-------------=-=-----=-===-======-------=--=---'



Reply to: