Bug#63988: marked as done (glibc dynmamic linker doesnt find some libs on alpha)
Your message dated Mon, 29 May 2000 17:03:29 +0200
with message-id <20000529170329.C3844@paradigm.rfc822.org>
and subject line Bug#63988: glibc dynmamic linker doesnt find some libs on alpha
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2000 22:05:00 +0000
>From flo@rfc822.org Thu May 11 17:05:00 2000
Received: from noose.gt.owl.de [62.52.19.4]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #2 (Debian))
id 12q14l-00049t-00; Thu, 11 May 2000 17:05:00 -0500
Received: by noose.gt.owl.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 712137FA; Fri, 12 May 2000 00:04:56 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by paradigm.rfc822.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 6A3D68FA7; Thu, 11 May 2000 23:26:10 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 23:26:10 +0200
From: Florian Lohoff <flo@rfc822.org>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: glibc dynmamic linker doesnt find some libs on alpha
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20000511232610.C323@paradigm.rfc822.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0.1i
Organization: rfc822 - pure communication
Sender: flo@rfc822.org
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: libc6.1
Version: 2.1.3-10
Severity: critical
The glibc 2.1 on alpha seems to be a bit confused about content of
ld.so.cache etc ...
For example xauth fails to start ...
--
xauth: error in loading shared libraries: libXmu.so.6: cannot open shared
object file: No such file or directory
--
Although ldconfig -v find the lib
ldconfig: version 1.9.11
/usr/X11R6/lib:
[...]
libXmu.so.6 => libXmu.so.6.0
[...]
ldd on xauth shows:
libXmu.so.6 => not found
libXt.so.6 => not found
libSM.so.6 => not found
libICE.so.6 => not found
libXext.so.6 => not found
libX11.so.6 => not found
libc.so.6.1 => /lib/libc.so.6.1 (0x000002000011e000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x0000020000000000)
An strace shows the cause
-------------------------------------------------------------------
execve("/usr/X11R6/bin/xauth", ["xauth"], [/* 18 vars */]) = 0
brk(0) = 0x12010a6a0
mmap(NULL, 8192, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x2000001e000
open("/etc/ld.so.preload", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
open("/etc/ld.so.cache", O_RDONLY) = 3
fstat(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=6238, ...}) = 0
mmap(NULL, 6238, PROT_READ, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0x20000020000
close(3) = 0
open("/lib/ev4/libXmu.so.6", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
stat("/lib/ev4", 0x1ffff118) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
open("/lib/libXmu.so.6", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
stat("/lib", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=4096, ...}) = 0
open("/usr/lib/ev4/libXmu.so.6", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
stat("/usr/lib/ev4", 0x1ffff118) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
open("/usr/lib/libXmu.so.6", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
stat("/usr/lib", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=5120, ...}) = 0
write(2, "xauth", 5xauth) = 5
write(2, ": error in loading shared librar"..., 37: error in loading shared libraries: ) = 37
write(2, "libXmu.so.6", 11libXmu.so.6) = 11
write(2, ": ", 2: ) = 2
write(2, "cannot open shared object file", 30cannot open shared object file) = 30
write(2, ": ", 2: ) = 2
write(2, "No such file or directory", 25No such file or directory) = 25
write(2, "\n", 1
) = 1
exit(127) = ?
-------------------------------------------------------------------
This is an "Alpha Multia"
----------------------------------------------------------
cpu : Alpha
cpu model : LCA4
cpu variation : -4294967301
cpu revision : 0
cpu serial number : Linux_is_Great!
system type : Noname
system variation : 0
system revision : 0
system serial number : MILO-2.0.35-c5.
cycle frequency [Hz] : 266634720
timer frequency [Hz] : 1024.00
page size [bytes] : 8192
phys. address bits : 34
max. addr. space # : 63
BogoMIPS : 259.52
kernel unaligned acc : 0 (pc=0,va=0)
user unaligned acc : 0 (pc=0,va=0)
platform string : N/A
cpus detected : 0
--------------------------------------------------------
So long ...
Flo
--
Florian Lohoff flo@rfc822.org +49-subject-2-change
"Technology is a constant battle between manufacturers producing bigger and
more idiot-proof systems and nature producing bigger and better idiots."
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 63988-done) by bugs.debian.org; 29 May 2000 15:04:01 +0000
>From flo@rfc822.org Mon May 29 10:04:01 2000
Return-path: <flo@rfc822.org>
Received: from noose.gt.owl.de [62.52.19.4]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 2 (Debian))
id 12wR5C-0000pZ-00; Mon, 29 May 2000 10:03:59 -0500
Received: by noose.gt.owl.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
id ACEF47FF; Mon, 29 May 2000 17:03:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by paradigm.rfc822.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 096718FA7; Mon, 29 May 2000 17:03:29 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 29 May 2000 17:03:29 +0200
From: Florian Lohoff <flo@rfc822.org>
To: Roland Rosenfeld <roland@debian.org>
Cc: 63988-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#63988: glibc dynmamic linker doesnt find some libs on alpha
Message-ID: <20000529170329.C3844@paradigm.rfc822.org>
References: <[🔎] 20000511232610.C323@paradigm.rfc822.org> <[🔎] 20000524173254.A12149@spinnaker.does-not-exist.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0.1i
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20000524173254.A12149@spinnaker.does-not-exist.org>; from roland@debian.org on Wed, May 24, 2000 at 05:32:54PM +0200
Organization: rfc822 - pure communication
Sender: flo@rfc822.org
Delivered-To: 63988-done@bugs.debian.org
On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 05:32:54PM +0200, Roland Rosenfeld wrote:
> > libXext.so.6 => not found
> > libX11.so.6 => not found
> > libc.so.6.1 => /lib/libc.so.6.1 (0x000002000011e000)
> > /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x0000020000000000)
>
> Isn't this the (well known) problem with ldso 1.9.11-8?
> If I remember correct, I had the same problems but upgrading ldso to
> 1.9.11-9 solved them all. Please check, whether this fixes your
> problem, too, so we could close this bug report.
Yep - It seems so - I tried and it solved the problem ...
Thanks
Flo
--
Florian Lohoff flo@rfc822.org +49-waiting-4-telekom
"Technology is a constant battle between manufacturers producing bigger and
more idiot-proof systems and nature producing bigger and better idiots."
Reply to: