Bug#60113: The shlibs file needs altering, doesn't it?

[Josip Rodin <joy@cibalia.gkvk.hr>]

On Fri, Mar 10, 2000 at 02:42:37PM +0200, Tuomas Jormola wrote:
> Shouldn't you replace every "(>= 2.1.2)" with "(>= 2.1.3)" in
> the libc6 shlibs file since the current stable upstream version
> now is 2.1.3?

The shlibs file needs to be updated whenever backwards binary compatibility
is broken (in fact, the SONAME should change, too, but this is glibc :). If
this was not the case with 2.1.2->2.1.3 upgrade, there is no need to change
the shlibs file.

-- 
enJoy -*/\*- don't even try to pronounce my first name