Bug#25603: marked as done (needless dependency)
Your message dated Tue, 11 May 1999 07:15:52 -0700
with message-id <v04204e02b35dbedd995a@[206.163.71.146]>
and subject line Fixed or no longer applicable.
has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I'm
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Ian Jackson
(administrator, Debian bugs database)
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Aug 1998 03:53:23 +0000
Received: (qmail 11858 invoked from network); 11 Aug 1998 03:53:22 -0000
Received: from sweat.cs.unm.edu (198.59.151.200)
by debian.novare.net with SMTP; 11 Aug 1998 03:53:22 -0000
Received: by sweat.cs.unm.edu
id m0z65Uv-0009XkC
(Debian Smail-3.2.0.101 1997-Dec-17 #2); Mon, 10 Aug 1998 21:53:21 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <m0z65Uv-0009XkC@sweat.cs.unm.edu>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 1998 21:53:21 -0600 (MDT)
From: Barak Pearlmutter <bap@cs.unm.edu>
To: maintonly@bugs.debian.org
Subject: needless dependency
Reply-to: bap@cs.unm.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Package: libc6-doc21
Version: 2.0.95-1.1
Depends: libc6 (= 2.0.95-1.1)
Not only is this dependency upon libc6 unnecessary, it actually makes
the package uninstallable on the alpha where libc6.1 is in use.
This documentation is in fact perfectly usable without libc; all it
needs is an info reader.
Reply to: