Bug#19849: marked as done (libc6-dev: Please recommend gcc | egcc)
Your message dated Thu, 11 Nov 1999 23:43:07 +0100
with message-id <19991111234307.A16511@in.tum.de>
and subject line libc6-dev: Please recommend gcc | egcc
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Mar 1998 18:12:02 +0000
Received: (qmail 9945 invoked from network); 17 Mar 1998 18:12:02 -0000
Received: from aroostook.gate.net (HELO aroostook.stormcrow.ml.org) (storm@199.227.254.139)
by debian.novare.net with SMTP; 17 Mar 1998 18:12:02 -0000
Received: (from storm@localhost)
by aroostook.stormcrow.ml.org (8.8.8/8.8.8/Debian/GNU) id NAA31376;
Tue, 17 Mar 1998 13:12:00 -0500
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 1998 13:12:00 -0500
Message-Id: <199803171812.NAA31376@aroostook.stormcrow.ml.org>
From: "Scott K. Ellis" <ellis@valueweb.net>
Subject: libc6-dev: Please recommend gcc | egcc
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 3.1.0
Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.0.7pre1-4
Since we have both gcc and egcc packages now, could you have libc6-dev
recommend one or the other so interested parties can easilly remove gcc
without dselect throwing a fit? (the egcc package is in incoming at the
moment)
-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.0 (frozen)
Kernel Version: Linux aroostook 2.1.79 #1 Tue Jan 13 14:21:37 EST 1998 i586 unknown
Versions of the packages libc6-dev depends on:
libc6 Version: 2.0.7pre1-4
kernel-headers-2.0.32 Version: 2.0.32-5
gcc Version: 2.7.2.3-4
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 19849-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Nov 1999 22:43:42 +0000
Received: (qmail 26349 invoked from network); 11 Nov 1999 22:43:38 -0000
Received: from tuminfo2.informatik.tu-muenchen.de (root@131.159.0.81)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 11 Nov 1999 22:43:38 -0000
Received: from atsystem1.informatik.tu-muenchen.de ([131.159.8.165] HELO atsystem1.informatik.tu-muenchen.de ident: postfix [port 33353]) by tuminfo2.informatik.tu-muenchen.de with SMTP id <110077-3284>; Thu, 11 Nov 1999 23:43:28 +0000
Received: from asterix.gallien (schoepf.modem.informatik.tu-muenchen.de [172.16.0.164])
by atsystem1.informatik.tu-muenchen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7848982D7
for <19849-done@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 11 Nov 1999 23:43:26 +0100 (MET)
Received: from schoepf by asterix.gallien with local (Exim 3.03 #1 (Debian))
id 11m2vr-0004IU-00; Thu, 11 Nov 1999 23:43:07 +0100
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 1999 23:43:07 +0100
From: Thomas Schoepf <schoepf@debian.org>
To: 19849-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: libc6-dev: Please recommend gcc | egcc
Message-ID: <19991111234307.A16511@in.tum.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="DocE+STaALJfprDB"
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0i
Sender: Thomas Schoepf <schoepf@in.tum.de>
--DocE+STaALJfprDB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
I'm closing this bug for two reasons:
1. libc6 recommends: c-compiler instead of depending on gcc.
2. egcc is now obsolete ;-)
Thomas
--=20
DSA/B0FA4F49;ElG/C631AF6E:FA38 2D7E 408F 61E4 BF49 B48F 04BD F5BE B0FA 4F49
RSA/2EA7BBBD: 08 96 1F CD AD 55 03 0F 95 92 B0 F2 04 32 4B 52
--DocE+STaALJfprDB
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iEYEARECAAYFAjgrRnsACgkQBL31vrD6T0nvPQCgizAX3HsfFZ3TnjyRvAf2bgK7
NKcAoKcO/MtgHCR09t8znqgQY1b3cjbl
=7Bxo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--DocE+STaALJfprDB--
Reply to: