[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#21307: marked as done (ldso: internal error: Assertion `! "unexpected dynamic reloc type"' failed!)



Your message dated 04 Aug 1999 23:10:45 +0200
with message-id <wjx1zdjfe0a.fsf@lapin.irisa.fr>
and subject line bug fixed
has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I'm
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Ian Jackson
(administrator, Debian bugs database)

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Apr 1998 20:05:56 +0000
Received: (qmail 8048 invoked from network); 17 Apr 1998 20:05:54 -0000
Received: from lima.irisa.fr (131.254.41.30)
  by debian.novare.net with SMTP; 17 Apr 1998 20:05:54 -0000
Received: from coelacanthe.irisa.fr (coelacanthe.irisa.fr [131.254.41.35])
	by lima.irisa.fr (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA05877
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 17 Apr 1998 22:05:48 +0200 (MET DST)
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: ldso: internal error: Assertion `! "unexpected dynamic reloc type"' failed!
From: Laurent Bonnaud <bonnaud@irisa.fr>
X-Attribution: Laurent
X-Mailer: Gnus 5.4 - Emacs 19.34
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Date: 17 Apr 1998 22:05:47 +0200
Message-ID: <wjxhg3s2oys.fsf@coelacanthe.irisa.fr>
Lines: 19


 Package: ldso
 Version: 1.9.7-1


Hi,

i have compiled and linked a C++ program with egcs, but when i try to
run it, ld.so outputs this error message :

BUG IN DYNAMIC LINKER ld.so: ../sysdeps/i386/dl-machine.h: 291: elf_machine_rel: Assertion `! "unexpected dynamic reloc type"' failed!

If you want i can mail you the executable (320Kb stripped, gziped), but
it is dynamicaly linked with some local libraries.

I have binutils_2.9-0.1 if that matters.

-- 
Laurent.


Reply to: