[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#37415: marked as done (libc6: problems with preinst on sparc)

Your message dated 18 May 1999 18:53:34 -0000
with message-id <[🔎] 19990518185334.20138.qmail@master.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#37415: fixed in glibc 2.1.1-6
has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I'm
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Ian Jackson
(administrator, Debian bugs database)

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 May 1999 14:26:10 +0000
Received: (qmail 26847 invoked from network); 10 May 1999 14:26:10 -0000
Received: from thunderchild.aszi.sztaki.hu (mail@
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 10 May 1999 14:26:10 -0000
Received: from gorgo by thunderchild.aszi.sztaki.hu with local (Exim 2.11 #1 (Debian))
	id 10gr0N-0005pw-00; Mon, 10 May 1999 16:26:03 +0200
From: Madarasz Gergely <gorgo@thunderchild.aszi.sztaki.hu>
Subject: libc6: problems with preinst on sparc
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 3.1.7
Message-Id: <[🔎] E10gr0N-0005pw-00@thunderchild.aszi.sztaki.hu>
Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 16:26:03 +0200

Package: libc6
Version: 2.1.1-3

(Reading database ... 23359 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace libc6 2.1.1-2 (using .../libc6_2.1.1-3_sparc.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.1.1-3_sparc.deb
 subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1

it probably misses an exit 0 at the end...

-- System Information
Debian Release: potato
Kernel Version: Linux thunderchild 2.2.7 #1 Fri Apr 30 10:50:10 CEST 1999 i586 unknown

Versions of the packages libc6 depends on:
ii  ldso            1.9.11-2       The Linux dynamic linker, library and utilit

Reply to: