[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: a couple notes on the libc 2.1 packages



At 20:58 -0500 1999-02-15, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
This seems to be the root of the confusion.  According to HJ Lu, this
should not be the case.  The existing libstdc++ should continue to
work, and applications should remain linked to it until recompiled.  Is
this not the case for you?

The thing is the soname difference is not necessary, the libc version should not be in the soname because there is no incompatibility. I have the 'libstdc++-libc6.0-1.so.2' symlink pointing at 'libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so' and everything works fine.
--
Joel Klecker (aka Espy)                     <URL:http://web.espy.org/>
<URL:mailto:jk@espy.org>                  <URL:mailto:espy@debian.org>
Debian GNU/Linux PowerPC -- <URL:http://www.debian.org/ports/powerpc/>


Reply to: