Bug#30412: marked as done (Libc6 (slink) conflicts with dpkg)
Your message dated Sun, 7 Feb 1999 19:54:09 -0800
with message-id <v04104418b2decee150a6@[206.163.71.146]>
and subject line Closing fixed bugs.
has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I'm
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Ian Jackson
(administrator, Debian bugs database)
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Dec 1998 02:00:33 +0000
Received: (qmail 28091 invoked from network); 6 Dec 1998 02:00:29 -0000
Received: from coretop-asy-3.rutgers.edu (HELO llamedos.dorm.rutgers.edu) (root@128.6.171.61)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 6 Dec 1998 02:00:29 -0000
Received: from localhost by llamedos.rutgers.edu
via sendmail with smtp
id <m0zmTdC-0042T9C@llamedos.dorm.rutgers.edu> (Debian Smail3.2.0.101)
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sat, 5 Dec 1998 21:09:06 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sat, 5 Dec 1998 21:09:04 -0500 (EST)
From: David Deephanphongs <david@llamedos.rutgers.edu>
Sender: david@localhost
Reply-To: deephand@eden.rutgers.edu
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Libc6 (slink) conflicts with dpkg
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.981205210355.19080A-100000@localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Package: libc6
Version: 2.0.7u-7
This version of libc6 conflicts with all available versions of dpkg,
making it impossible to install (and all the files that depend on it..)
I'm not sure whose problem this is, but I thought it should be mentioned..
David
---
In fact, the mere act of opening the box will determine the state of the
cat, although in this case there were three determinate states the cat
could be in: these being Alive, Dead, and Bloody Furious.
-- Schrodinger's Moggy explained
(Terry Pratchett, Lords and Ladies)
Reply to: