Joel Klecker <jk@espy.org> writes: > No it shouldn't, I was in error for including ldd in libc6 on i386. > glibc 2.0 ldd can't fully replace to one from ld.so because it > doesn't support libc4 binaries (I am dubious on the importance of > that, however). I'm not. It would be unamusing for example to have a release of Debian which couldn't actually be used on master. -- James "Never trust trucks"