Bug#10395: marked as done (timezones: zic is undocumented)
Your message dated Tue, 26 Jan 1999 16:48:29 -0800
with message-id <v04103d17b2d3cfb2c22f@[206.163.71.152]>
and subject line Closing severity fixed bugs
has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I'm
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Ian Jackson
(administrator, Debian bugs database)
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Jun 1997 16:02:41 +0000
Received: (qmail 31897 invoked from network); 6 Jun 1997 16:02:37 -0000
Received: from adam.osf.lt (193.219.250.17)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 6 Jun 1997 16:02:33 -0000
Received: (qmail 29473 invoked from network); 6 Jun 1997 16:05:34 -0000
Received: from hava.osf.lt (uuo00391@193.219.250.18)
by adam.osf.lt with SMTP; 6 Jun 1997 16:05:34 -0000
Received: from o00391.UUCP (uuo00391@localhost) by hava.osf.lt
with UUCP (8.8.5/28Mar95) on Fri, 6 Jun 1997 19:01:48 +0300 (EET DST)
X-Authentication-Warning: hava.osf.lt: uuo00391 set sender to o00391.UUCP!rch using -f
Received: by rch.osf.lt (grade C)
id m0wa1Pi-0001aHC
(Debian /\oo/\ Smail3.1.29.1 #29.37); Fri, 6 Jun 97 18:58 EEST
Message-ID: <19970606185844.04393@pub.osf.lt>
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 1997 18:58:45 +0300
To: submit@bugs.debian.org, Ricardas Cepas <rch@pub.osf.lt>
Subject: timezones: zic is undocumented
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.67
From: Ricardas Cepas <rch@pub.osf.lt>
Package: timezones
Version: 2.0.3-4
-- System Information
Debian Release: 1.3
Kernel Version: Linux rch 2.0.29 #1 Fri Mar 14 00:29:42 MET 1997 i486 unknown
Versions of the packages timezones depends on:
libc6 Version: 2.0.3-4
--- Begin /etc/timezone (modified conffile)
Europe/Vilnius
--- End /etc/timezone
Reply to: