Re: [RFS] MintPy packaging
On 6/26/22 21:45, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 5/15/22 09:31, Antonio Valentino wrote:
The package for mintpy still needs some work, but, for a proper
testing, I would like to have all dependencies are in the archive.
The dependencies are now in the archive and on the mirrors enabling
package builds without custom repos for those.
With the recent update of lintian, the overrides need to be updated and
new issues need to be reviewed.
I haven't had time for an extensive review yet, but I did notice the
long list of dependencies for the binary package which shouldn't be
required as ${python3:Depends} and dh_python3 should take care of those
using setup.py install_requires. Am I missing something that explains
the hardcoded list of dependencies?
The link overload in the extended description is also not great.
GFDL license is considered non-free when it contains invariant sections,
does this apply to MintPy?
https://wiki.debian.org/DFSGLicenses#GNU_Free_Documentation_License_.28GFDL.29
debian/control
You may want to consider a separate -doc package.
debian/rules
python{version} should be replaced with {interpreter}.
https://manpages.debian.org/bullseye/dh-python/pybuild.1.en.html#variables_that_can_be_used_in_ARGUMENTS_and_COMMAND
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
Reply to: