Re: Status of osrm
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
On 05/10/2015 10:45 AM, Christopher Baines wrote:
> On 10/05/15 00:16, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> Hi Christopher,
>>
>> On 07/10/2014 04:34 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
>>> I did not got any response for you when I answered your
>>> sponsoring request. Are you remaining interested in
>>> maintaining the osrm package?
>>>
>>> My problem was that it is not injected in Debian GIS Vcs (even
>>> if the debian/control file is claiming that this is the case.
>>> Since I have some spare cycles left for this I take the freedom
>>> to do this for you and also apply some changes to make it
>>> compliant with the Debian GIS policy. Please ping the list if
>>> you are remain interested and I will sponsor the package for
>>> you (without the detour via mentors.d.n).
>>
>> The above questions by Andreas remains, are you still interested
>> in maintaining the osrm package?
>
> Yes, I am still interested in maintaining osrm.
That's great, thanks!
>> I took the liberty to update the package with the latest
>> upstream release, and it pretty much ready for upload. Do you
>> have anything you'd like to add?
>
> Thanks for updating the package. I have just pushed some minor
> fixes/improvements to the man pages.
Very welcome additions, thanks for those too.
> I would like to test the package, and check the documentation
> (also comparing with the upstream versions). But that will probably
> have to wait a few weeks, as I am busy with exams at the moment.
>
> Feel free to upload it now if you want to though.
We have about two years until the next freeze so I'm not in a hurry,
but we shouldn't wait too long for an upload. We can always upload
another revision when issues are uncovered.
Good luck with your exams!
Kind Regards,
Bas
- --
GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2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=c5eO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: