[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#757243: RFS: qmapshack/0.2.0+ds1-1



On Sun, 2014-08-17 at 19:46 +0200, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:

> Can you please advice what to do with "LGPL-2.1 with Digia Qt LGPL
> Exception 1.1" license?

> Files: src/helpers/CTextEditWidget.cpp
>  src/helpers/CTextEditWidget.h

I'd write:
"License: QT_COMMERICIAL or GPL-3 or LGPL-2.1 with Digia Qt LGPL
Exception 1.1"

(as you have the option to choose one of the three. The execption is
like the OpenSSL exception in the examples of the link[1])

And then of course matching License paragraphs for the new licenses.  

 [1]
https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/#license-syntax


> 
> best regards
> 
> 
> mira
> 
> 
-- 
tobi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: