[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[DebianGIS] Re: move gdal 1.3.1 package to unstable



[Hamish]
> Just a reminder along a similar vein, I have the following packages
> prepared for Sarge and waiting to go into the DebianGIS repository:
>
> gpsd-clients_2.28-2.dgis.stable.1_i386.deb
> gpsd_2.28-2.dgis.stable.1_i386.deb
> libgdal1-grass_1.2.6-1.dgis.stable.1_i386.deb
> qgis-dev_0.7.3-0.dgis.stable.1_i386.deb
> qgis-plugin-grass_0.7.3-0.dgis.stable.1_i386.deb
> qgis_0.7.3-0.dgis.stable.1_i386.deb
>
> (+ .diff.gz + .changes files)

Are they ready to go into into the debian archive as well?

> All seem to work ok. Any .dsc files need to be created by a devel
> signing the .changes files. The .orig.tar.gz are already in the
> repository, these are just a binary rebuild of the unstable versions
> using Sarge's versions of the dependent libraries.
>
> I can provide the download link to a devel who can upload them.

Why do you need a debian developer to upload into the debian-gis
repository?  I would expect it to be possible to get your GPG key
added to the list of accepted keys for the debian-gis repository, if
that is what it takes for you to do it yourself.

(And please submit the URL here, to allow me or anyone else to pick up
the packages. :)




Reply to: