Re: [Pkg-grass-general] Re: QGIS and grass
On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 18:49 +0100, Silke Reimer wrote:
> Hallo!
>
> On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 11:28:55AM -0500, Steve Halasz wrote:
> > I believe these segfaults are due to things being in flux. I'm changing
> > the name of the libgrass package with practically every upload. Right
> > now I'm working on getting grass into unstable with the help of my
> > sponsor. He said since there are no sonames that the packages should be
> > named ligrass and libgrass-dev. But I plan to work on a patch for grass
> > to add sonames that would make them ligrass0 and libgrass0-dev again. I
> > don't think Silke should bother uploading a new libgdal1-grass until
> > this is all sorted out.
>
> OK. So I will wait with a new package until you let me know that
> your package has its final name. OK?
OK, I'll let you know when it's safe.
Steve
> >
> > I also apologize for making the recent upgrades difficult. The changing
> > library names should be dealt with gracefully, but since these are
> > experimental packages you have to suffer as a result my sloth and
> > incompetence :)
> >
> > In the meantime you can rebuild your libgdal1-grass yourself quite
> > quickly:
> >
> > apt-get source libgdal1-grass
> > cd ligdal-grass
> > vi debian/control
> > - edit library names appropriately
> > dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot
> > cd ..
> > su root
> > dpkg -i libgdal1-grass_1.2.5-0.dgis.unstable.1_i386.deb
>
> Paolo, I know that you strongly need a working gdal-grass package.
> If you have problems to build this package by your own according to
> these commands please contact me. (Except that I will not be able to
> do this on Friday due to an external meeting.) Then I can rather
> easily provide such a package for you. But I think Steve is right,
> that it doesn't make sense that I build a new package each time he
> builds a new grass package so I would like to wait until the
> packages have found their final name.
>
> Many greetings,
>
> Silke
>
Reply to: