Bug#1023690: gcc-11 should not be shipped in bookworm
- To: Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>, 1023690@bugs.debian.org
- Cc: Aurelien Jarno <aurel32@debian.org>
- Subject: Bug#1023690: gcc-11 should not be shipped in bookworm
- From: Helmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de>
- Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2025 09:26:15 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20250820072615.GA2078448@subdivi.de>
- Reply-to: Helmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de>, 1023690@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <71bb6b32-0f8c-4499-9b2e-d7f02bad2108@debian.org>
- References: <166793508608.14779.13916265719185736700.reportbug@localhost> <11f8c30a-cb38-a42f-89f6-831c165885cd@debian.org> <166793508608.14779.13916265719185736700.reportbug@localhost> <Y9/AKU/Cu6BcGbHa@localhost> <166793508608.14779.13916265719185736700.reportbug@localhost> <Z3bVHSYLZ0J09bOL@aurel32.net> <322c91ca-ae3b-4df8-9dff-0e7480eed255@debian.org> <Z3bgK0sNkl1wV2BO@aurel32.net> <166793508608.14779.13916265719185736700.reportbug@localhost> <71bb6b32-0f8c-4499-9b2e-d7f02bad2108@debian.org> <166793508608.14779.13916265719185736700.reportbug@localhost>
Hi Matthias,
On Thu, Jan 02, 2025 at 07:54:04PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> does it personally hurt you?
>
> 11 and 12 are the versions which were shipped in stable, and apparently
> people still use these packages for backports.
Versions 11 and 12 (predating gcc-for-host) include a lot of
cross-architecture undeclared file conflicts. Doing archive wide
conflict analysis is dominated by these two packages and poses a
significant additional cost on that work.
Yes, just keeping them poses a cost. Now it s up to you and me how to
deal with that. I see three possible routes forward:
* Delete them from the archive
* Fix the undeclared file conflicts
* Exclude them from conflict analysis
I hope you can see how I find the first option most attractive, but then
I'm probably missing parts of the bigger picture.
Helmut
Reply to: