[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
] [
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
] [
Date Index
] [
Thread Index
]
Bug#1081445: downgrading, building sequentially is nice to have, but not a must
To
:
1081445@bugs.debian.org
,
1081447@bugs.debian.org
,
1081448@bugs.debian.org
,
1081446@bugs.debian.org
Cc
:
debian-ada@lists.debian.org
Subject
: Bug#1081445: downgrading, building sequentially is nice to have, but not a must
From
: Matthias Klose <
doko@debian.org
>
Date
: Fri, 13 Sep 2024 07:25:03 +0200
Message-id
: <
[🔎]
502f5f96-d4d1-43e1-94bd-c86638b75cbd@debian.org
>
Reply-to
: Matthias Klose <
doko@debian.org
>,
1081445@bugs.debian.org
References
: <E1h3Nsp-0002VL-4Y@paradis.debian.org>
Control: severity -1 important
Downgrading, building sequentially is nice to have, but not a must. And
as you write, your fix just papers over a dependency issue. Please
could you address this upstream, if it's really important for you?
Reply to:
debian-gcc@lists.debian.org
Matthias Klose (on-list)
Matthias Klose (off-list)
Prev by Date:
gcc-12-cross is marked for autoremoval from testing
Next by Date:
Processed: downgrading, building sequentially is nice to have, but not a must
Previous by thread:
gcc-12-cross is marked for autoremoval from testing
Next by thread:
Processed: downgrading, building sequentially is nice to have, but not a must
Index(es):
Date
Thread