[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1016238: marked as done (autofdo FTBFS with LLVM 14)

Your message dated Thu, 29 Sep 2022 21:35:23 +0000
with message-id <E1oe1Bj-00HaH2-Ab@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1016238: fixed in autofdo 0.19-2.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1016238,
regarding autofdo FTBFS with LLVM 14
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1016238: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1016238
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: autofdo
Version: 0.19-2.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lucas@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.


Relevant part (hopefully):
> g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.  -I. -I./third_party/perf_data_converter/src/quipper -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -I/usr/lib/llvm-14/include -D_GNU_SOURCE -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -DCREATE_LLVM_PROF -g -O2 -ffile-prefix-map=/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>=. -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -c -o create_llvm_prof-llvm_profile_writer.o `test -f 'llvm_profile_writer.cc' || echo './'`llvm_profile_writer.cc
> llvm_profile_writer.cc: In static member function ‘static bool autofdo::LLVMProfileBuilder::Write(const std::string&, llvm::sampleprof::SampleProfileFormat, const autofdo::SymbolMap&, const autofdo::StringIndexMap&)’:
> llvm_profile_writer.cc:54:42: error: cannot convert ‘const llvm::StringMap<llvm::sampleprof::FunctionSamples>’ to ‘const llvm::sampleprof::SampleProfileMap&’ {aka ‘const std::unordered_map<llvm::sampleprof::SampleContext, llvm::sampleprof::FunctionSamples, llvm::sampleprof::SampleContext::Hash>&’}
>    54 |   if (std::error_code EC = Writer->write(profiles)) {
>       |                                          ^~~~~~~~
>       |                                          |
>       |                                          const llvm::StringMap<llvm::sampleprof::FunctionSamples>
> In file included from llvm_profile_writer.h:9,
>                  from llvm_profile_writer.cc:30:
> /usr/lib/llvm-14/include/llvm/ProfileData/SampleProfWriter.h:55:57: note:   initializing argument 1 of ‘virtual std::error_code llvm::sampleprof::SampleProfileWriter::write(const llvm::sampleprof::SampleProfileMap&)’
>    55 |   virtual std::error_code write(const SampleProfileMap &ProfileMap);
>       |                                 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
> make[2]: *** [Makefile:1040: create_llvm_prof-llvm_profile_writer.o] Error 1


The full build log is available from:
http://qa-logs.debian.net/2022/07/28/autofdo_0.19-2.1_unstable.log

All bugs filed during this archive rebuild are listed at:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-20220728;users=lucas@debian.org
or:
https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na&merged=ign&fnewerval=7&flastmodval=7&fusertag=only&fusertagtag=ftbfs-20220728&fusertaguser=lucas@debian.org&allbugs=1&cseverity=1&ctags=1&caffected=1#results

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

If you reassign this bug to another package, please marking it as 'affects'-ing
this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects

If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine
so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: autofdo
Source-Version: 0.19-2.2
Done: Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
autofdo, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1016238@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> (supplier of updated autofdo package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 23:41:57 +0300
Source: autofdo
Architecture: source
Version: 0.19-2.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian GCC Maintainers <debian-gcc@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org>
Closes: 1016238
Changes:
 autofdo (0.19-2.2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * Build with LLVM 13. (Closes: #1016238)
Checksums-Sha1:
 6e298ab28ca22aab80a699856d4b6b710591f635 1905 autofdo_0.19-2.2.dsc
 bdf0bf42d77caa69819a054e08c4e652a37d3781 5944 autofdo_0.19-2.2.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 e2a1991462c565adbebc5b8013171292b0ee687b625e13c2658878a53a772cfd 1905 autofdo_0.19-2.2.dsc
 94f9f009f91d86ecc6b8febcf59df493e8643f224d7fed64dfefd081336f9468 5944 autofdo_0.19-2.2.debian.tar.xz
Files:
 c5ca9e1d279f55501dc37da7b9429c13 1905 devel optional autofdo_0.19-2.2.dsc
 f9a79a023476b48d8d4178ec48c9c1a9 5944 devel optional autofdo_0.19-2.2.debian.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEOvp1f6xuoR0v9F3wiNJCh6LYmLEFAmMg7CwACgkQiNJCh6LY
mLEKoQ/+KGhvePpP24vbaZaaZ75nOQzuFa6jq1uDZdLc+lcKlCW2yTweUWg9Gh89
EUEQGzYtD9CVqqD2ZRXR0KAxbMYCsvko6FShDNfYkrbuNYJcM8lIFxZZse+Q88Pk
78ZQjSoFrJFKAe/0QTtk5CGxeLPP9Jju/tj9YlmdhLIAHDrIG94oX82dnb0IXec1
3fYyDu0Dh4WuznHnRLCz28LmaEqpqMmcveMmOK1cgsyA7C+XAe+ov4SLponhqiLi
ynVEN7kUbJvIlcie0OhvV3YbMjEqs6iSWJ5Fi35mOzpgLO1hb/jb7jPagiMiTDoq
xS8EhW4UxmJ29HJ95T20Yd2I3grWa1d++1jV09QxhMAdxZEJPlZpJn+77Y4ELoNA
er+6Un+SBH096ZjiWnYdH/p6d7CBgyobc+Jg009MR5gmaTNmtyTlcv9pYiqb5GnR
C7layexME2nIppggpALxMEoNDYn8Q+iGKqjDqDzeSKawtiOnknegcgscYlzIoF+t
n8BuEnXv0yqS0VwLw+Yw1F+RA59kSWnvNcBk8TJWOxsop35T7O/6XBEuk3fR9Yhk
c+UPgletf28nCB5laNP9FWiib8sJflUt5BC7DkP4l7ozjzTGFgkil61uL89wvvFS
LoWCGD09//c7zEFSpUm236xpoeUzT6BPHW6V63ncEz7Z7dXFPlA=
=B2l3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
Reply to: