[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#982760: marked as done (gcc-11: ftbfs on mips64el due to ada problem)

Your message dated Fri, 2 Jul 2021 09:22:58 +0800
with message-id <2049bcd0-6419-dc82-a70f-94b998f3f213@cipunited.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#982760: gcc-11: ftbfs on mips64el due to ada problem
has caused the Debian Bug report #982760,
regarding gcc-11: ftbfs on mips64el due to ada problem
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
982760: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=982760
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: src:gcc-11
Version: 11-20210207-1
Control: forward -1 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98996


s-pack96.adb should generate   ldl/ldr pair + lwl/lwr pair since 96=64+32.
When generate the pairs, it use the type SUBREG instead of REG, while in
     mips_expand_ext_as_unaligned_load
it only process REG_P but without SUBREG_P.

Attachment: mips64-ada.diff
Description: Binary data


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Sun, 14 Feb 2021 11:06:59 +0100 Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>
> thanks for providing a local patch.
>
> please see https://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html#patches
> how to submit patches upstream.
>
> Sorry to say, but it's not the first time you don't follow these procedures. 

>


This problem has been fixed in upstream.
FYI: 20200702: gcc-11 ftbfs again seems only on Cavium machine, since I test it on my loongson box, it works well.
We did meet the similar problem with LLVM: there cannot be branch insn include ll/sc pair. 

I am digging the real problem.


> Matthias
>
>

--- End Message ---
Reply to: