[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#916376: marked as done (gfortran-8-* has bad provides)

Your message dated Sat, 13 Feb 2021 13:07:12 +0000
with message-id <[🔎] E1lAudk-0000FN-1x@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#954831: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #916376,
regarding gfortran-8-* has bad provides
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
916376: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=916376
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: gcc-8
Tags: patch
User: helmutg@debian.org
Usertags: rebootstrap
Control: affetcs -1 + src:gcc-8-cross src:gcc-8-cross-ports

gfortran-8-<anytriplet> presently Provides: gfortran-mod-15 and given
that gfortran-8-<anytriplet> is Multi-Arch: foreign, this is provided
for any architecture. libopenmpi-dev Depends: gfortran-8 |
gfortran-mod-15. Therefore gfortran-8-<anytriplet> satisfies
libopenmpi-dev's dependency. That's not what we want here though. The
dependency should only be satisfied by a compiler that matches
libopenmpi-dev's architecture. Therefore these provides are bad. They
result in strange solutions which are found by dose-builddebcheck, but
are not by apt.

I propose simply removing these provides for the cross tools. The
attached patch implements that.

Helmut

diff -u gcc-8-8.2.0/debian/control.m4 gcc-8-8.2.0/debian/control.m4
--- gcc-8-8.2.0/debian/control.m4
+++ gcc-8-8.2.0/debian/control.m4
@@ -3565,7 +3565,8 @@
 ')dnl
 Priority: optional
 Depends: BASEDEP, gcc`'PV`'TS (= ${gcc:Version}), libidevdep(gfortran`'PV-dev,,=), ${dep:libcdev}, ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}
-Provides: fortran95-compiler, ${fortran:mod-version}
+ifdef(`TARGET',`',`Provides: fortran95-compiler, ${fortran:mod-version}
+')dnl
 Suggests: ${gfortran:multilib}, gfortran`'PV-doc,
  libdbgdep(gfortran`'FORTRAN_SO-dbg,),
  libcoarrays-dev
@@ -3900,7 +3901,8 @@
 ')dnl
 Priority: optional
 Depends: BASEDEP, ifdef(`STANDALONEGO',`${dep:libcc1}, ',`gcc`'PV`'TS (= ${gcc:Version}), ')libidevdep(go`'GO_SO,,>=), ${dep:libcdev}, ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}
-Provides: go-compiler
+ifdef(`TARGET',`',`Provides: go-compiler
+')dnl
 Suggests: ${go:multilib}, gccgo`'PV-doc, libdbgdep(go`'GO_SO-dbg,)
 Conflicts: ${golang:Conflicts}
 Breaks: libgo12`'LS (<< 8-20171209-2)
@@ -4858,7 +4860,8 @@
 ')dnl
 Priority: optional
 Depends: SOFTBASEDEP, g++`'PV`'TS (>= ${gcc:SoftVersion}), ${dep:gdccross}, ${dep:phobosdev}, ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}
-Provides: gdc, d-compiler, d-v2-compiler
+ifdef(`TARGET',`',`Provides: gdc, d-compiler, d-v2-compiler
+')dnl
 Replaces: gdc (<< 4.4.6-5)
 BUILT_USING`'dnl
 Description: GNU D compiler (version 2)`'ifdef(`TARGET)',` (cross compiler for TARGET architecture)', `')

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 1:8.4.0-7+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package gcc-8 has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/954831

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and
will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the
earliest.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Joerg Jaspert (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

--- End Message ---
Reply to: