[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#950632: marked as done (gcc-8/8.3.0-27 binaries not built from 8.3.0-27 sources on s390x)



Your message dated Tue, 04 Feb 2020 12:19:19 +0000
with message-id <E1iyxAl-000Eb8-Q4@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#950632: fixed in gcc-8 8.3.0-28
has caused the Debian Bug report #950632,
regarding gcc-8/8.3.0-27 binaries not built from 8.3.0-27 sources on s390x
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
950632: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=950632
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: gcc-8
Version: 8.3.0-27
Severity: serious

gcc-8/s390x has been manually uploaded to fix the breakage introduced
by gcc-10. However it has not been built from the 8.3.0-27 sources. At
least the changelog file is different from other architectures, causing
multiarch co-installability issues:

--- amd64/usr/share/doc/gcc-8-base/changelog.Debian   2020-02-03 07:07:47.000000000 +0000
+++ s390x/usr/share/doc/gcc-8-base/changelog.Debian   2020-02-03 07:07:47.000000000 +0000
@@ -13,8 +13,8 @@
   * Dump the config.log for the configure step when it fails.
   * On architectures where libgcc_s.so is a symlink, replace the symlink with
     a simple linker script.
-  * libgcc-dev: Don't ship a libgcc_so.1 symlink in gcclibdir.
-    Addresses: #950525.
+  * libgcc-dev: Fix libgcc_so.1 symlink when building without common libraries.
+    Closes: #950525.
   * Bump standards version.

  -- Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>  Mon, 03 Feb 2020 08:07:47 +0100

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: gcc-8
Source-Version: 8.3.0-28

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gcc-8, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 950632@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Matthias Klose <doko@ubuntu.com> (supplier of updated gcc-8 package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2020 12:57:33 +0100
Source: gcc-8
Architecture: source
Version: 8.3.0-28
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian GCC Maintainers <debian-gcc@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Matthias Klose <doko@ubuntu.com>
Closes: 950632
Changes:
 gcc-8 (8.3.0-28) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Sourceful no-change upload. Closes: #950632.
Checksums-Sha1:
 de4d9612ca218c5fcbfc87a4f470bfbab852823a 19704 gcc-8_8.3.0-28.dsc
 5420de743c157082ad3f5610656c26efb028e059 1122196 gcc-8_8.3.0-28.diff.gz
 4e0140a0a0f858cd7923d29d17351cbf961b39e2 9290 gcc-8_8.3.0-28_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 4d4c78c186f64c3fbcdb1ffb40719a857abbfa9051305298b7e2350124bed481 19704 gcc-8_8.3.0-28.dsc
 62488fd5db693fa84d9fc0621bf49470a6435f28ea7f6979c4ad65d1504a5dc6 1122196 gcc-8_8.3.0-28.diff.gz
 9f7f2b0d024009f6a54e3248d9e089936f93c7de87f611a3f5c8ddcff8bb5d0a 9290 gcc-8_8.3.0-28_source.buildinfo
Files:
 72cd7efdd194ee8f8483f311a6f4b2ef 19704 devel optional gcc-8_8.3.0-28.dsc
 15323899e83a27854cafe9e96287418f 1122196 devel optional gcc-8_8.3.0-28.diff.gz
 8b97d66eabe81a1d55dcfc386a3da99f 9290 devel optional gcc-8_8.3.0-28_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQJEBAEBCAAuFiEE1WVxuIqLuvFAv2PWvX6qYHePpvUFAl45XQMQHGRva29AdWJ1
bnR1LmNvbQAKCRC9fqpgd4+m9c2rD/9MJAGakUF2o2Q2p3XdduVFR0Q+gmquWSxF
mNcJUNxBA84TeLRuVd1/a3wGHWWVgyfJi/jXgQZGqXKJde4EeVCUCS3/1iNCZRBU
JAk4baw+14woG/ASj7bGJmv+dgiFW/eU/E8akuJivfgAJCbHYmvKRexjga18Ym6n
kHNyB5fMvqrC8Ah9OrnPIEJ5af3uys5vsvtG6d5jgnmxAUutTX7GnRRbY+EQYl01
LDSEMnnXO8LMa2b7UjelhG5JM9YA+PccgK9JDTTkk9+6pKPKOw3c+zJlpO7iXT4D
mQmGd/QJrcUifHprxw9MlJJrh8Jcj7M98AQ4qZS/YbDPz0iCU4kwxvsTOzhGvfQW
S+dGgMFmaT6pIpAzXxw//zqYuzKzpuCReDYHKWPW/irbklnziEsv2o4oH/92QEtG
UPCAVkjd9hvKznXxmGGhLYVbkdi/xsiZKt5juHMk/Ue2OY+y3AWQ3EzmPjM3EpLA
k05OamVlc4ZEhfn2fgTwdJyiUJ+N7AFKgKAARezsfoUTvYaJxB4PeT2H5yoaT22Y
AU1iNoe9Q/kdgruYHsR49wt7Giv8+C6pRWfF+RtqYTsuueBbDsV3cT26bDM3MwOb
mS0r2fQcKDTg0riecL0CuK0YLhQXmbij7v8NoV0adyCj0vZPX08StHa3h5iQfnA5
0ChUQY8Xtg==
=ebGY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply to: