Bug#961159: lib32{,x}gcc-s1: please provide lib{,x}32gcc1 (= 1:${binary:Version})
On 8/12/20 11:16 PM, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 02:15:51PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> On 21/05/2020 14.05, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>> On 5/20/20 10:32 PM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>>>> With the transitional packages gone in 10.1.0-2, please add versioned
>>>> (epoched!) provides on the old names (as already done in libgcc-s1)
>>>> in order to keep old packages installable along the latest gcc.
>>>
>>> I'd like to avoid that. Please build the nvidia packages using the new package
>>> names.
>>
>> This has nothing to do with nvidia. This breaks keeping old compilers
>> around, which so far worked fine for a long time.
>
> Seconded. I have all versions of gcc starting at 4.4 that I would like
> to keep, but the upgrade require to remove them.
I don't want to do that. What exactly depends on the non-default multilib libraries?
Reply to: