--- Begin Message ---
Package: libgcc1
Version: 1:10-20200202-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
apt update && apt upgrade -y
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
before upgrade libgcc1:
ii libgcc1:sparc64 1:9.2.1-25 sparc64 GCC support library
after upgrade:
ii libgcc1 1:10-20200202-1 sparc64 GCC support library (dependency package)
* What was the outcome of this action?
$ cat hello_world.c
#include <stdio.h>
int main() {
printf("%s \n", "hello world!");
}
$ gcc hello_world.c
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgcc_s
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
* What outcome did you expect instead?
able to compile c source codes files.
Downgrading package back to version 9.2.1-25 helps
Going to post (gcc -v) and/or (ldconfig -v) on a request.
PS: Probably related to #946285
-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'unreleased'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: sparc64
Kernel: Linux 5.5.0-08726-g46d6b7becb1d (SMP w/32 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
Versions of packages libgcc1 depends on:
ii gcc-10-base 10-20200202-1
ii libc6 2.29-1
ii libgcc-s1 10-20200202-1
libgcc1 recommends no packages.
libgcc1 suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 10-20200204-1
On 2/5/20 9:55 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> * Add breaks on libgcc-N-dev packages on arm64, s390x and sparc64.
>> Closes: #950550, #950579.
>
> This is not enough. All architectures are affected when using gold.
this bug doesn't have anything to do with gold. Closing again.
If you want to be pedantic, feel free to open another issue. otoh, I don't see
this as RC, as you can use the default linker.
--- End Message ---