[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#819429: marked as done (libstdc++-5-dev: Kodi test crashes in STL on armel and armhf)

Your message dated Wed, 23 Jan 2019 10:00:21 +0000
with message-id <E1gmFKX-000B2o-7A@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#920166: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #819429,
regarding libstdc++-5-dev: Kodi test crashes in STL on armel and armhf
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
819429: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=819429
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: libstdc++-5-dev
Version: 5.3.1-13
Control: affects -1 kodi

Dear Maintainer,

Kodi fails to build on armel and armhf due to a crashing test:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=kodi&arch=armhf&ver=16.0%2Bdfsg1-2&stamp=1458793597
...
[----------] 1 test from TestScraperUrl
[ RUN      ] TestScraperUrl.General
[       OK ] TestScraperUrl.General (0 ms)
[----------] 1 test from TestScraperUrl (0 ms total)

[----------] 3 tests from TestSortUtils
[ RUN      ] TestSortUtils.Sort_SortBy
/bin/bash: line 1: 15871 Segmentation fault      /«BUILDDIR»/kodi-16.0+dfsg1/$check_program
Makefile:608: recipe for target 'check' failed
make[1]: *** [check] Error 139
make[1]: Leaving directory '/«BUILDDIR»/kodi-16.0+dfsg1'
...

I have reproduced the issue on abel.debian.org with Address Sanitizer:
...
[----------] 1 test from TestScraperUrl
[ RUN      ] TestScraperUrl.General
[       OK ] TestScraperUrl.General (0 ms)
[----------] 1 test from TestScraperUrl (0 ms total)

[----------] 3 tests from TestSortUtils
[ RUN      ] TestSortUtils.Sort_SortBy
ASAN:SIGSEGV
=================================================================
==18199==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: SEGV on unknown address 0x00000000 (pc 0x0045dbac bp 0xac70f6b4 sp 0xbeb800d0 T0)
    #0 0x45dbab in std::pair<Field const, CVariant>::pair<Field&&, 0u>(std::tuple<Field&&>&, std::tuple<>&, std::_Index_tuple<0u>, std::_Index_tuple<>) /usr/include/c++/5/tuple:1172
    #1 0x45dbab in std::pair<Field const, CVariant>::pair<Field&&>(std::piecewise_construct_t, std::tuple<Field&&>, std::tuple<>) /usr/include/c++/5/tuple:1161
    #2 0x45dbab in void __gnu_cxx::new_allocator<std::_Rb_tree_node<std::pair<Field const, CVariant> > >::construct<std::pair<Field const, CVariant>, std::piecewise_construct_t const&, std::tuple<Field&&>, std::tuple<> >(std::pair<Field const, CVariant>*, std::piecewise_construct_t const&, std::tuple<Field&&>&&, std::tuple<>&&) /usr/include/c++/5/ext/new_allocator.h:120
    #3 0x45dbab in void std::allocator_traits<std::allocator<std::_Rb_tree_node<std::pair<Field const, CVariant> > > >::construct<std::pair<Field const, CVariant>, std::piecewise_construct_t const&, std::tuple<Field&&>, std::tuple<> >(std::allocator<std::_Rb_tree_node<std::pair<Field const, CVariant> > >&, std::pair<Field const, CVariant>*, std::piecewise_construct_t const&, std::tuple<Field&&>&&, std::tuple<>&&) /usr/include/c++/5/bits/alloc_traits.h:530
    #4 0x45dbab in void std::_Rb_tree<Field, std::pair<Field const, CVariant>, std::_Select1st<std::pair<Field const, CVariant> >, std::less<Field>, std::allocator<std::pair<Field const, CVariant> > >::_M_construct_node<std::piecewise_construct_t const&, std::tuple<Field&&>, std::tuple<> >(std::_Rb_tree_node<std::pair<Field const, CVariant> >*, std::piecewise_construct_t const&, std::tuple<Field&&>&&, std::tuple<>&&) /usr/include/c++/5/bits/stl_tree.h:529
    #5 0x45dbab in std::_Rb_tree_node<std::pair<Field const, CVariant> >* std::_Rb_tree<Field, std::pair<Field const, CVariant>, std::_Select1st<std::pair<Field const, CVariant> >, std::less<Field>, std::allocator<std::pair<Field const, CVariant> > >::_M_create_node<std::piecewise_construct_t const&, std::tuple<Field&&>, std::tuple<> >(std::piecewise_construct_t const&, std::tuple<Field&&>&&, std::tuple<>&&) /usr/include/c++/5/bits/stl_tree.h:546
    #6 0x45dbab in std::_Rb_tree_iterator<std::pair<Field const, CVariant> > std::_Rb_tree<Field, std::pair<Field const, CVariant>, std::_Select1st<std::pair<Field const, CVariant> >, std::less<Field>, std::allocator<std::pair<Field const, CVariant> > >::_M_emplace_hint_unique<std::piecewise_construct_t const&, std::tuple<Field&&>, std::tuple<> >(std::_Rb_tree_const_iterator<std::pair<Field const, CVariant> >, std::piecewise_construct_t const&, std::tuple<Field&&>&&, std::tuple<>&&) /usr/include/c++/5/bits/stl_tree.h:2170
    #7 0xf200d7 in std::map<Field, CVariant, std::less<Field>, std::allocator<std::pair<Field const, CVariant> > >::operator[](Field&&) /usr/include/c++/5/bits/stl_map.h:502
    #8 0xf200d7 in TestSortUtils_Sort_SortBy_Test::TestBody() /home/rbalint/kodi-16.0+dfsg1/xbmc/utils/test/TestSortUtils.cpp:32
    #9 0xe2f443 in void testing::internal::HandleSehExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::Test, void>(testing::Test*, void (testing::Test::*)(), char const*) /home/rbalint/kodi-16.0+dfsg1/lib/gtest/src/gtest.cc:2078
    #10 0xe2f443 in void testing::internal::HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::Test, void>(testing::Test*, void (testing::Test::*)(), char const*) /home/rbalint/kodi-16.0+dfsg1/lib/gtest/src/gtest.cc:2114
    #11 0xe277ff in testing::Test::Run() /home/rbalint/kodi-16.0+dfsg1/lib/gtest/src/gtest.cc:2151
    #12 0xe2799f in testing::TestInfo::Run() /home/rbalint/kodi-16.0+dfsg1/lib/gtest/src/gtest.cc:2326
    #13 0xe27aa3 in testing::TestCase::Run() /home/rbalint/kodi-16.0+dfsg1/lib/gtest/src/gtest.cc:2444
    #14 0xe27dd3 in testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::RunAllTests() /home/rbalint/kodi-16.0+dfsg1/lib/gtest/src/gtest.cc:4315
    #15 0xe281a3 in bool testing::internal::HandleSehExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::internal::UnitTestImpl, bool>(testing::internal::UnitTestImpl*, bool (testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::*)(), char const*) /home/rbalint/kodi-16.0+dfsg1/lib/gtest/src/gtest.cc:2078
    #16 0xe281a3 in bool testing::internal::HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::internal::UnitTestImpl, bool>(testing::internal::UnitTestImpl*, bool (testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::*)(), char const*) /home/rbalint/kodi-16.0+dfsg1/lib/gtest/src/gtest.cc:2114
    #17 0xe281a3 in testing::UnitTest::Run() /home/rbalint/kodi-16.0+dfsg1/lib/gtest/src/gtest.cc:3926
    #18 0x3efcef in RUN_ALL_TESTS() /usr/include/gtest/gtest.h:2288
    #19 0x3efcef in main /home/rbalint/kodi-16.0+dfsg1/xbmc/test/xbmc-test.cpp:52
    #20 0xb3a37beb in __libc_start_main (/lib/arm-linux-gnueabi/libc.so.6+0x16beb)

AddressSanitizer can not provide additional info.
SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: SEGV /usr/include/c++/5/tuple:1172 std::pair<Field const, CVariant>::pair<Field&&, 0u>(std::tuple<Field&&>&, std::tuple<>&, std::_Index_tuple<0u>, std::_Index_tuple<>)
==18199==ABORTING

The test on other architectures does not fail. I'm assigning it to libstdc++-5-dev because it looks like an STL issue in handling the Field constant.

Thanks,
Balint

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 5.5.0-12+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package gcc-5 has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/920166

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

--- End Message ---
Reply to: