Please review my attached patch.
Or by debdiff
http://deb.debian.org/debian/pool/main/g/gcc-8-cross/gcc-8-cross_24.dsc
http://mips64el.bfsu.edu.cn/debian/gcc-8-cross-mipsen/gcc-8-cross_25~cross1.dsc
YunQiang Su <syq@debian.org> 于2019年1月10日周四 上午11:09写道：
>
> Bastian Blank <bblank@thinkmo.de> 于2018年8月23日周四 上午1:37写道：
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 08:27:29AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > On 22.08.2018 06:00, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > > The version of the source package (2) does not show up in the binary version.
> > > > So neither rebuilds with a new changelog, nor bin-nmus will work. You already
> > > > add a "cross1", so why not add it there?
> > > that's how it is done for all cross packages. The code is just a branch of the
> > > orgiginal gcc cross packaging. So apparently it is fine, or was fine with
> > > ftp-masters?
> >
> > I don't know. Given that packages with overriden versions are
> > particularly rare, it could just be an oversight.
> >
> > > Is there more than that to reject the package? Please reconsider.
> >
> > If you fix this problem with the next uploads of all affected packages,
> > which seems to be more then this one.
>
> I guess we need these packages more now, as MIPS open is r6.
> Let's figure a solution:
>
> How about:
> add an `~crossN' in the source packages, and grep it from changelog
> in debian/rules
> Is it acceptable?
>
> I will figure out one and upload to some else where.
>
> >
> > Bastian
> >
> > --
> > First study the enemy. Seek weakness.
> > -- Romulan Commander, "Balance of Terror", stardate 1709.2
Attachment:
nodejs8-mips64r6el.diff
Description: Binary data