[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#908589: gcc-8 documentation packages



Hello,

пн, 24 июн. 2019 г. в 12:27, Guo Yixuan <culu.gyx@gmail.com>:
>
> Hello Matthias and Dmitry,
>
> Sorry for being MIA. As I'm currently busy with my life and work, I want to give up all my packages for adoption. (I forgot about the proper procedure here, so please kindly take over as you wish.)

Thank you for your previous work. I'm fine with co-maintaining
packages if you'd like to do that in future.

> Please let me know if a GPG-signed copy of this email is needed.
>
> Thank you!
> Yixuan
>
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 5:51 PM Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 22.06.19 01:01, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > вт, 21 мая 2019 г. в 16:58, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>:
>> >>
>> >> Hello,
>> >>
>> >> I've updated gcc-doc/gcc-doc-defaults packages to support new gcc-8
>> >> documentation generation. NMU Packages are uploaded to
>> >> mentors.debian.net
>> >> for review, git trees are put on salsa.debian.org/gcc-doc (-defaults).
>> >
>> > It's been nearly a month without any response. Is it an expected thing before
>> > buster release? Or should I contact debian-mentors looking for sponsors
>> > for these packages?
>>
>> I'm trying to stay away uploading the gcc*-doc packages.  Yes, maybe contacting
>> debian-mentors is the right thing to do, if Guo is MIA.



-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry


Reply to: