Bug#905009: gcc-8-x86-64-linux-gnu: Relocations in generic ELF (EM: 183)
Package: gcc-8-x86-64-linux-gnu
Version: 8.1.0-12cross1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
The x86_64-linux-gnu (target) on arm64 (host) cross-compiler is broken.
/usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: CMakeFiles/test-minicrypto.t.dir/deps/micro-ecc/uECC.c.o: Relocations in generic ELF (EM: 183
I am using distcc so the problem must be in the compiler proper,
as distcc only uses the cross-compiler, not cross-binutils.
(I am running distcc from an amd64 machine)
Regards
-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
APT prefers unstable-debug
APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: arm64 (aarch64)
Kernel: Linux 4.15.11-mainline-rev1 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
Versions of packages gcc-8-x86-64-linux-gnu depends on:
ii binutils-x86-64-linux-gnu 2.31.1-2
ii cpp-8-x86-64-linux-gnu 8.1.0-12cross1
ii gcc-8-x86-64-linux-gnu-base 8.1.0-12cross1
ii libc6 2.27-5
ii libcc1-0 8.2.0-1
ii libgcc-8-dev-amd64-cross 8.1.0-12cross1
ii libgcc1 1:8.2.0-1
ii libgmp10 2:6.1.2+dfsg-3
ii libisl19 0.19-1
ii libmpc3 1.1.0-1
ii libmpfr6 4.0.1-1
ii libstdc++6 8.2.0-1
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.11.dfsg-1
Versions of packages gcc-8-x86-64-linux-gnu recommends:
ii libc6-dev-amd64-cross 2.27-3cross3
Versions of packages gcc-8-x86-64-linux-gnu suggests:
pn gcc-8-doc <none>
pn gcc-8-locales <none>
pn gcc-8-multilib-x86-64-linux-gnu <none>
pn libasan5-dbg-amd64-cross <none>
pn libatomic1-dbg-amd64-cross <none>
pn libgcc1-dbg-amd64-cross <none>
pn libgomp1-dbg-amd64-cross <none>
pn libitm1-dbg-amd64-cross <none>
pn liblsan0-dbg-amd64-cross <none>
pn libmpx2-dbg-amd64-cross <none>
pn libquadmath0-dbg-amd64-cross <none>
pn libtsan0-dbg-amd64-cross <none>
pn libubsan1-dbg-amd64-cross <none>
-- no debconf information
Reply to: