Re: GCC and binutils updates for buster
On 17.07.2018 12:35, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hi Matthias!
>
> On 07/16/2018 05:59 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> I understand that port maintainers want to have their port included as a release
>> architecture, however it becomes a burden if neither the upstream nor the Debian
>> port maintainers can keep up with the general upstream development. Maybe we
>> need something in between the alternatives of being a release arch or not,
>> having the benefit of packages in testing/stable, but not being supported in a
>> release.
>
> Care to elaborate what you are referring to? At least for powerpc, ppc64 and
> sparc64, gcc seems well enough maintained that bugs get fixed in a reasonable
> amount of time.
I was only looking at release architectures.
Reply to: