Re: Arch qualification for buster: call for DSA, Security, toolchain concerns
Hi Niels,
On 06/27/2018 05:03 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> List of concerns for architectures
> ==================================
>
> The following is a summary from the current architecture qualification
> table.
>
> * Concern for ppc64el and s390x: we are dependent on sponsors for
> hardware.
> (Raised by DSA; carried over from stretch)
>
> * Concern for armel and armhf: only secondary upstream support in GCC
> (Raised by the GCC maintainer; carried over from stretch)
>
> * Concern for mips, mips64el, mipsel and ppc64el: no upstream support
> in GCC
> (Raised by the GCC maintainer; carried over from stretch)
I am not sure if ppc64el should be here. GCC does have a good ppc64el support
and this is being maintained by some IBM folks.
Can you elaborate a bit more on this concern for ppc64el?
Reply to: