Bug#889106: Multiarch interpreter names for traditional architectures

To: javier--CbphpPOVok9WFxGWvC7CbkqlsxDZyT@jasp.net
Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org, 888073@bugs.debian.org, 889106@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#889106: Multiarch interpreter names for traditional architectures
From: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2018 15:02:25 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20180209140225.GC2428@aurel32.net>
Reply-to: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>, 889106@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <1517878529.21342.216.camel@sempati.menos4>
References: <1517756479.29018.96.camel@sempati.menos4> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1802051644140.4209@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <1517853521.21342.182.camel@sempati.menos4> <1517878529.21342.216.camel@sempati.menos4> <1517535890.20410.217.camel@sempati.menos4>

On 2018-02-06 01:55, Javier Serrano Polo wrote:
> Debian glibc officially supports multiarch interpreter names, even for
> traditional architectures. For instance, the multiarch interpreter for
> x86_64 is /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 . There is
> consensus among Debian-based distros.

The notion of "multiarch interpreter" doesn't exist. On debian x86_64,
the program interpreter is /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 just like any
other x86_64 distribution.

Aurelien

-- 
Aurelien Jarno                          GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurelien@aurel32.net                 http://www.aurel32.net

Reply to:

Prev by Date: gcc-8-cross-ports_1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable
Next by Date: Bug#889106: Multiarch interpreter names for traditional architectures
Previous by thread: gcc-8-cross-ports_1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable
Next by thread: Bug#889106: Multiarch interpreter names for traditional architectures
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread