[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#810055: marked as done (gcc bug)

Your message dated Thu, 29 Jun 2017 10:21:14 +0200
with message-id <42b1efb6-3a09-58cc-8e99-ab226a9ef768@debian.org>
and subject line Re: gcc-bug
has caused the Debian Bug report #810055,
regarding gcc bug
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
810055: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=810055
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: gcc
Version : gcc (Debian 4.9.2-10) 4.9.2 or gcc (Debian 4.7.4-3) 4.7.4

The problem:  the libtcmalloc_minimal.so complied by gcc 4.7.4 got higher latency than complied by gcc 4.9.2
tcmalloc version:  gperftools 2.1
system: debian jessie 8.2

ps:Maybe I didn't describe the issue so clear.

BRs
yongsu

2016-01-04 16:17 GMT+08:00 张永肃 <zhangyongsu@bytedance.com>:
hi submit@bugs.debian.org 
Maybe I didn't describe the issue so clear.

Package: gcc
Version : gcc (Debian 4.9.2-10) 4.9.2 or gcc (Debian 4.7.4-3) 4.7.4

The problem:  the libtcmalloc_minimal.so complied by gcc 4.7.4 got higher latency than complied by gcc 4.9.2
tcmalloc version:  gperftools 2.1
system: debian jessie 8.2

BRs
yongsu



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
No feedback, closing issue.

--- End Message ---
Reply to: