Your message dated Tue, 20 Sep 2016 22:15:11 +0000 with message-id <[🔎] E1bmTJn-0005QY-0D@franck.debian.org> and subject line Bug#838316: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #766840, regarding [armhf] Illegal assembler code generated with -O2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 766840: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=766840 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: [armhf] Illegal assembler code generated with -O2
- From: Ole Streicher <olebole@debian.org>
- Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2014 10:48:40 +0100
- Message-id: <544CC378.8090007@debian.org>
Package: gcc Version: 4:4.9.1-5 Hi, If trying to compile the attached file on armhf with gcc -O2 -c reg.c one gets /tmp/ccuv9e3N.s: Assembler messages: /tmp/ccuv9e3N.s:106: Error: registers may not be the same -- `str r2,[r2],#4' A workaround is to use either -fno-expensive-optimizations or -fno-schedule-insns. gcc -O1 -fexpensive-optimizations -fschedule-insns -c reg.c shows the same error. The file is a shortened version from one of my packages (starlink-ast) which always compiled nicely on armhf, started to fail with gcc-4.9.1 [1]. With gcc-4.8.4, the compilation succeeded [2]: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -I/usr/include/star -DTHREAD_SAFE -g -O2 -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -c region.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/libstarlink_ast_la-region.o /tmp/ccJsRMs3.s: Assembler messages: /tmp/ccJsRMs3.s:21403: Warning: base register written back, and overlaps one of transfer registers /tmp/ccJsRMs3.s:28133: Error: registers may not be the same -- `str r3,[r3],#4' /tmp/ccJsRMs3.s:28971: Warning: base register written back, and overlaps one of transfer registers The warnings are on similar places as above, just with the floats replaced by doubles or long doubles. Best regards Ole [1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=starlink-ast&arch=armhf&ver=8.0.2%2Bdfsg-1&stamp=1414223014 [2] https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=starlink-ast&arch=armhf&ver=8.0.0%2Bdfsg-2&stamp=1400237749#include <stdlib.h> void *astFree(); void *astMalloc(); int astOK = 1; int MaskF( int inside, int ndim, const int lbnd[], const int ubnd[], float in[], float val) { void *used_region; float *c, *d, *tmp_out; double *lbndgd, *ubndgd; int *lbndg, *ubndg, idim, ipix, nax, nin, nout, npix, npixg, result = 0; if ( !astOK ) return result; lbndg = astMalloc( sizeof( int )*(size_t) ndim ); ubndg = astMalloc( sizeof( int )*(size_t) ndim ); lbndgd = astMalloc( sizeof( double )*(size_t) ndim ); ubndgd = astMalloc( sizeof( double )*(size_t) ndim ); npix = 1; npixg = 1; for ( idim = 0; idim < ndim; idim++ ) { npix *= ubnd[ idim ] - lbnd[ idim ]; npixg *= ubndg[ idim ] - lbndg[ idim ]; } if( npixg <= 0 ){ if( astGetNegated( used_region )) { c = in; for( ipix = 0; ipix < npix; ipix++ ) *(c++) = val; } } else if( npixg > 0) { if(astGetNegated( used_region )) { tmp_out = astMalloc( sizeof( float )*(size_t) npix ); if( tmp_out ) { c = tmp_out; } } result += astResampleF( used_region, lbnd, ubnd, ubnd, lbndg, ubndg); } return result; }
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 450746-done@bugs.debian.org,727621-done@bugs.debian.org,734973-done@bugs.debian.org,748024-done@bugs.debian.org,751812-done@bugs.debian.org,753134-done@bugs.debian.org,755295-done@bugs.debian.org,756945-done@bugs.debian.org,759683-done@bugs.debian.org,759870-done@bugs.debian.org,762005-done@bugs.debian.org,762238-done@bugs.debian.org,762640-done@bugs.debian.org,764195-done@bugs.debian.org,764280-done@bugs.debian.org,764624-done@bugs.debian.org,764732-done@bugs.debian.org,766840-done@bugs.debian.org,768265-done@bugs.debian.org,772436-done@bugs.debian.org,773065-done@bugs.debian.org,774541-done@bugs.debian.org,774543-done@bugs.debian.org,774548-done@bugs.debian.org,777169-done@bugs.debian.org,777275-done@bugs.debian.org,781060-done@bugs.debian.org,782391-done@bugs.debian.org,784544-done@bugs.debian.org,785249-done@bugs.debian.org,785762-done@bugs.debian.org,786883-done@bugs.debian.org,797151-done@bugs.debian.org,797426-done@bugs.debian.org,798029-done@bugs.debian.org,799953-done@bu gs.debian.org,805616-done@bugs.debian.org,810868-done@bugs.debian.org,814239-done@bugs.debian.org,816776-done@bugs.debian.org,823222-done@bugs.debian.org,
- Cc: gcc-4.9@packages.debian.org, gcc-4.9@packages.qa.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#838316: Removed package(s) from unstable
- From: Debian FTP Masters <ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 22:15:11 +0000
- Message-id: <[🔎] E1bmTJn-0005QY-0D@franck.debian.org>
Version: 4.9.4-2+rm Dear submitter, as the package gcc-4.9 has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/838316 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Chris Lamb (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)
--- End Message ---