Your message dated Tue, 20 Sep 2016 09:54:11 +0000 with message-id <[🔎] E1bmHkh-0005vg-Vx@franck.debian.org> and subject line Bug#838315: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #182360, regarding [Fixed in 5.2] GNAT.OS_Lib.Close ignores return value to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 182360: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=182360 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: gnat: GNAT.OS_Lib.Close ignores return value
- From: "Steven J. Murdoch" <debianbts+Steven.Murdoch@cl.cam.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 21:49:08 +0000
- Message-id: <E18nQTJ-0000Fz-00@maxwell>
Package: gnat Version: 3.14p-3 Severity: normal GNAT.OS_Lib.Close is defined as: procedure Close (FD : File_Descriptor); pragma Import (C, Close, "close"); However the C function imported returns an int which is 0 on success and -1 if an error has occurred. Since GNAT.OS_Lib.Close ignores this return value any error will not be detected. According to the Linux Man page close(2): Not checking the return value of close is a common but nevertheless serious programming error. File system implementations which use techniques as ``write-behind'' to increase performance may lead to write(2) succeeding, although the data has not been written yet. The error status may be reported at a later write operation, but it is guaranteed to be reported on closing the file. Not checking the return value when closing the file may lead to silent loss of data. This can especially be observed with NFS and disk quotas. I would have expected that if the C close call returned -1 then GNAT.OS_Lib.Close would either raise an exception or return an error (either as an out parameter or as a return value). -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux maxwell 2.4.20 #1 Sat Jan 18 13:48:50 GMT 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages gnat depends on: ii libc6 2.2.5-11.2 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 182360-done@bugs.debian.org,247564-done@bugs.debian.org,251265-done@bugs.debian.org,559447-done@bugs.debian.org,569343-done@bugs.debian.org,611248-done@bugs.debian.org,746689-done@bugs.debian.org,748297-done@bugs.debian.org,748298-done@bugs.debian.org,780031-done@bugs.debian.org,783877-done@bugs.debian.org,812587-done@bugs.debian.org,818774-done@bugs.debian.org,825621-done@bugs.debian.org,830436-done@bugs.debian.org,833677-done@bugs.debian.org,
- Cc: gnat-4.9@packages.debian.org, gnat-4.9@packages.qa.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#838315: Removed package(s) from unstable
- From: Debian FTP Masters <ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 09:54:11 +0000
- Message-id: <[🔎] E1bmHkh-0005vg-Vx@franck.debian.org>
Version: 4.9.4-3+rm Dear submitter, as the package gnat-4.9 has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/838315 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Chris Lamb (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)
--- End Message ---