Re: Bug#811687: FTBFS with GCC 6: enumerator value for... is not

To: Klaus Ethgen <Klaus@Ethgen.de>, Martin Michlmayr <tbm@hpe.com>, 811687@bugs.debian.org
Cc: debian-gcc@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#811687: FTBFS with GCC 6: enumerator value for... is not
From: Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 13:07:24 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 569F787C.40101@debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20160120101456.GA23975@ikki.ethgen.ch>
References: <20160119073505.26A49280CCB@dl580gen9-02.hlinux> <20160120005833.GJ4951@jirafa.cyrius.com> <[🔎] 20160120101456.GA23975@ikki.ethgen.ch>

On 20.01.2016 11:14, Klaus Ethgen wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Hi Martin,

Am Mi den 20. Jan 2016 um  1:58 schrieb Martin Michlmayr:

Severity: important


I wouldn't see that as important as gcc6 is not the current compiler.


It is important. We stated that GCC 6 will be the default for the next release.

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Bug#811687: FTBFS with GCC 6: enumerator value for... is not
  - From: Klaus Ethgen <Klaus@Ethgen.de>