[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#808026: RFP: g++-arm-linux-gnueabi -- GNU Arm cross compiler Amd64



On Tue, 15 Dec 2015 13:56:24 +0000 Neil Williams <codehelp@debian.org>
wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Dec 2015 12:55:27 +0100
> Mélaine Aubin Guifo <guimeau@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> These packages already exist at versions 4:5.3.1-1 and others,
> including on amd64.
> 
> > Package: g++-arm-linux-gnueabihf
> 
> https://packages.debian.org/unstable/g++-arm-linux-gnueabihf
> 
> > Severity: 
> > X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
> > 
> > --- Please fill out the fields below. ---
> > 
> >    Package name: g++-arm-linux-gnueabi
> 
> https://packages.debian.org/unstable/g++-arm-linux-gnueabi
> 
> >         Version: 4:5.3.1
> > Upstream Author: [Mélaine Aubin Guifo <guimeau@gmail.com>]
> >         License: [GPL, LGPL, BSD, MIT/X, etc.]
> >     Description: [DESCRIPTION]
> > 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> 
> Neil Williams
> =============
> http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
> 

Yes these package already exist in Sid, but could not be installed due
to wrong dependecies or conflicts:
sudo aptitude install gcc-arm-linux-gnueabi g++-arm-linux-gnueabi
The following packages will be upgraded: 
  cpp-arm-linux-gnueabi{b} g++-arm-linux-gnueabi{b} gcc-arm-linux-
gnueabi{b} 
3 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 11 not
upgraded.
Need to get 17.7 kB of archives. After unpacking 0 B will be used.
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
 cpp-arm-linux-gnueabi : Depends: cpp-5-arm-linux-gnueabi (>= 5.3.1-3~) 
but 5.3.1-2cross1 is installed.
 gcc-arm-linux-gnueabi : Depends: gcc-5-arm-linux-gnueabi (>= 5.3.1-3~) 
but 5.3.1-2cross1 is installed.
 g++-arm-linux-gnueabi : Depends: g++-5-arm-linux-gnueabi (>= 5.3.1-3~) 
but 5.3.1-2cross1 is installed.
The following actions will resolve these dependencies:

     Remove the following packages:
1)     cpp-arm-linux-gnueabi       
2)     g++-arm-linux-gnueabi       
3)     gcc-arm-linux-gnueabi       
4)     gfortran-arm-linux-gnueabi


Reply to: