Bug#797109: libstdc++6: please consider bumping shlibs to version >= 5

[Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>]

On 08/27/2015 10:24 PM, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Package: libstdc++6
> Version: 5.2.1-15
> Severity: normal
> 
> The libstdc++ transition would be easier to track if its shlibs forced
> a dependency on libstdc++ (>= 5) even for packages not using any of
> the new symbols.

I'd like to avoid that.

> In practice I suspect most C++ packages depend on a package that has needed
> a transition anyway, and some packages (such as KDE) are apparently
> migrating, but actually broken in testing.

please could you name such a package and point out why it is broken?  I'd like
to understand the issue and not work around it.  If these are some specific
packages, these surely can be added to the current libstdc++:Breaks.

  Matthias