[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#577926: marked as done (gcc-4.3: fatal error: error writing to /tmp/317065.1.cas/ccmB9478.s: Success)



Your message dated Thu, 8 Oct 2015 18:21:20 +0200
with message-id <20151008162120.GA7477@cventin.lip.ens-lyon.fr>
and subject line Re: gcc-4.3: fatal error: error writing to /tmp/317065.1.cas/ccmB9478.s: Success
has caused the Debian Bug report #577926,
regarding gcc-4.3: fatal error: error writing to /tmp/317065.1.cas/ccmB9478.s: Success
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
577926: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=577926
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: gcc-4.3
Version: 4.3.2-1.1
Severity: normal

On a Debian/stable machine (amd64), I got the following error:

tst-tomate-1268827996-3840.c:1000: fatal error: error writing to /tmp/317065.1.cas/ccmB9478.s: Success
compilation terminated.

How can a success be a fatal error???

BTW, I've seen similar error messages ending with ": Success" with
other software (e.g. dict and svn). The problem may come from a null
value in errno. But if errno is 0, there should be no errors.

This error has been reproduced several times for a short period.
Most of the time, there are no errors. Compiler options included:
  -std=c99 -O3 -march=native -fprofile-generate
I can't provide the full command line since this came from a script
that runs permanently.

(No system information as I had to send the bug report from a
Debian/unstable machine, as reportbug is broken on Debian/stable.)



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Closing this old bug for an old GCC version. IIRC, I could never
reproduce it.

-- 
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)

--- End Message ---

Reply to: