Bug#792204: gcc-5: FTBFS on sparc64, mismatched symbols files
On 07/16/2015 05:17 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 07/16/2015 04:16 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> #if defined(_GLIBCXX_HAS_GTHREADS) && defined(_GLIBCXX_USE_C99_STDINT_TR1) \
>> && (ATOMIC_INT_LOCK_FREE > 1)
>>
>> Apparently this doesn't trigger on sparc64, so please find out why not. I assume
>> ATOMIC_INT_LOCK_FREE is the culprit here.
>
> Alright. I'm doing a test build now with ATOMIC_INT_LOCK_FREE removed
> and see if that makes any difference.
No, you need to find out why this condition isn't triggered, removing it doesn't
make any sense.
Reply to: