[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#786850: marked as done (gcc-4.9: AddressSanitizer fails with pthread_cond_init)



Your message dated Fri, 29 May 2015 14:01:37 +0200
with message-id <[🔎] 55685521.1010905@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#786850: gcc-4.9: AddressSanitizer fails with pthread_cond_init
has caused the Debian Bug report #786850,
regarding gcc-4.9: AddressSanitizer fails with pthread_cond_init
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
786850: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=786850
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: gcc-4.9
Version: 4.9.2-16
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

Trivial C program:

    #include <stdio.h>
    #include <pthread.h>
    int main (void)
    {   pthread_cond_t cond;
        pthread_cond_init(&cond, NULL);
        return 0;
    }

Above works correctly when compiled and run (even under Valgrind) as:

     gcc -Wall cond_init.c -o cond_init && valgrind ./cond_init

on both x86_64/linux and armhf/linux.

However, then compiled with -fsanitize=address as:

     gcc -Wall -fsanitize=address cond_init.c -o cond_init && ./cond_init

it works correctly on x86_64/linux but gets a SIGSEGV on armhf/linux:

    ASAN:SIGSEGV
    =================================================================
    ==23193==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: SEGV on unknown address 0x00000000 (pc 0x00000000
    sp 0xbeffefb0 bp 0x00000000 T0)

    AddressSanitizer can not provide additional info.
    SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: SEGV ??:0 ??
    ==23193==ABORTING

Apparently this was a problem in gcc-4.8

    https://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/issues/detail?id=297

but I'm using the Debian gcc-4.9 package.



-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (800, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: armhf (armv7l)

Kernel: Linux 3.10.72+ (SMP w/8 CPU cores; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_AU.UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)

Versions of packages gcc-4.9 depends on:
ii  binutils        2.25-7
ii  cpp-4.9         4.9.2-16
ii  gcc-4.9-base    4.9.2-16
ii  libc6           2.19-18
ii  libcloog-isl4   0.18.3-1
ii  libgcc-4.9-dev  4.9.2-16
ii  libgmp10        2:6.0.0+dfsg-6
ii  libisl13        0.14-2
ii  libmpc3         1.0.3-1
ii  libmpfr4        3.1.2-3
ii  zlib1g          1:1.2.8.dfsg-2+b1

Versions of packages gcc-4.9 recommends:
ii  libc6-dev  2.19-18

Versions of packages gcc-4.9 suggests:
pn  gcc-4.9-doc      <none>
pn  gcc-4.9-locales  <none>
pn  libasan1-dbg     <none>
pn  libatomic1-dbg   <none>
pn  libcilkrts5-dbg  <none>
pn  libgcc1-dbg      <none>
pn  libgomp1-dbg     <none>
pn  libitm1-dbg      <none>
pn  liblsan0-dbg     <none>
pn  libquadmath-dbg  <none>
pn  libtsan0-dbg     <none>
pn  libubsan0-dbg    <none>

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Control: tags -1 + wontfix fixed-upstream upstream

On 05/27/2015 02:30 PM, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
>> please recheck with gcc-5 from unstable.
> 
> 
> Works with gcc-5.

--- End Message ---

Reply to: