Bug#778181: [Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#778181: Bug#778181: xen: ftbfs with GCC-5
clone 778181 -1
reassign -1 src:xen
thanks
from the upstream discussion, it doesn't seem to be clear if this is a GCC
issue. Is this new in GCC 5? your referenced bug number seems a bit old (PR57725).
in http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2015-03/msg01692.html
PR64963 is referenced, but which is marked as fixed upstream.
in http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2015-03/msg01694.html
you write that you suppose I will take this upstream, without noting me. No I
will not. Please do the bike shedding with upstream yourself ;)
On 03/13/2015 02:39 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> Control: reassign -1 gcc-5 5-20150205-1
>
> On Fri, 2015-03-13 at 12:04 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> Control: found -1 4.5.0-1
>> Control: forwarded -1 http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2015-03/msg01678.html
>>
>> On Thu, 2015-02-12 at 10:38 +0000, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>> Package: src:xen
>>> Version: 4.4.1-6
>>
>> FWIW I see exactly the same issue with Xen 4.5.0-1 from experimental the
>> 4.6 development branch upstream, when built with debug=n.
>>
>> I've asked upstream, I'm not sure if this is a gcc5 issue or not.
>
> The response, from
> http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2015-03/msg01690.html:
> they're properly
> annotated. I.e. the compiler forgets to propagate the section
> attribute when generating variants of the functions (e.g. after
> having detected that it always gets called with some argument
> set to some specific value).
>
> And then
> http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2015-03/msg01692.html
> points to https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57725 which does
> seem to be correct.
>
> Ian.
>
>
Reply to: